anonymized final design

Transforming Customer Service

10.01.21 - 11.15.21
Removed tool impediments to improve specialist and customer experience

Quick Summary

Report
Problem
Customer Service Specialists had to
  • needlessly repeat tasks when dealing with impatient customers
  • navigate multiple tools while on calls with customers
TASK
My Actions
  • Used task analyses to uncover repeated tasks and measure time on task
  • Launched survey to gather data on frustrations and satisfaction level
ANALYTICS
Outcome
Average Call Time
35%
Customer Satisfaction
14%

Team

  • Product Manager
  • UX Lead
  • UX Designer
  • Program Manager
  • Product Owner (Client)

Modernizing Customer Service at the world's largest airline...

This airline handles over 15,000 customer issues each day by phone. However, the primary toolset that customer service specialists use is over 10 years old.

Cancellation. It is the second highest reason customers call. However, specialists continually reported problems with cancelling passengers/flights/segments and the client Product team wanted us to investigate.

Landscape

A challenge...

The system complexity, driven by a vast set of institutional rules, was certainly a hurdle to mention. To surmount this, I created cheat sheets and lunch-n-learns to up skill the team and preface design work. We also created flow charts before any wireframes to make sure we could articulate how the solution worked.

Revealing the pain points

To truly understand the cancellation process, we needed to go beyond surface-level complaints. Our research combined three key approaches: shadowing specialists during live calls, gathering quantitative feedback through surveys, and documenting detailed task analyses.

During one-hour side-by-side sessions with specialists, we watched as they juggled multiple tools and struggled with flight searches. The frustration was palpable in their responses:

"Everything seems to take forever"
"I repeat a lot of actions"

These observations led us to track specific metrics:

  • time on task
  • total steps
  • repeated tasks
Example Task Analysis

Two critical problems emerged from our analysis:

  • Flight searches were unnecessarily complex. For example, customers needed flight numbers but rarely had them ready—leading to frustrated customers and longer call times.
  • Specialists needed to navigate between up to four different tools to complete a single cancellation, creating a disjointed and time-consuming experience.

Building a strategic foundation

With clear evidence of our specialists' challenges, we needed a framework to guide our solution. We developed a UX Strategy Blueprint* that aligned business goals with user needs, establishing two core guiding principles that would drive every design decision:

  • Make core tasks incredibly efficient
  • Consolidate information to eliminate tool-switching

*Thank you Jim Kalbach for creating this template!

UX Strategy template (template authored by Jim Kalbach)

Turning insight into solutions

These principles proved invaluable during concept testing. When specialists saw Miles information integrated directly into their main view—instead of a click away—their enthusiasm validated our blueprint. To refine our approaches, we:

My early sketches for displaying Miles information

Before...😡

After...😊

Measuring Real-World Impact

To validate our solution, we conducted usability tests with five specialists across different customer service teams through UserTesting.com. The results exceeded our initial goals!

  • ⬇️ Task completion time dropped by 55%
  • ⬇️ Total process steps reduced by 30%
  • ✂️ Repetitive actions cut by 90%

But the real proof came two months after launch. The streamlined system delivered measurable improvements to both specialists and customers:

  • 🤘 Average call duration decreased by 35%
  • 🥳 Customer satisfaction scores jumped by 14%
fast_rewind

In retrospect...

One thing I found particular success with was tying the design rationale back to the UX Strategy. The client really appreciated the correlation and it gave the strategy more weight as the project progressed.

anonymized final design showing canceling a single passenger